Monday, July 31, 2006

Spousal Bounty Hunters

It started out innocently enough. Bradman and myself were talking about something or other when all of the sudden the conversation took a weird wild tangent;

“I’ll pay $1,000 to whoever finds me my future wife.”

Tired of going to the clubs and bars (not that I really frequented them anyway) and tiring of courting ditz after drug-addict after psycho-path after spoiled brat daddy’s girl, dating has quickly gone from something that would put you on cloud nine for a week when you were 16 to a chore you abhor by the age of 31. And instead of having that giddy optimistic feeling of (what was that thing called again….ummm…OH YEAH) hope, now I find myself asking, “OK, what the hell is going to be wrong with this one.” Thus, without any rational economic thinking, I just blurted out, “Look, I’ll pay you or anybody who finds me my wife $1,000.”

But the more I thought about this idea, the more I realized this was genius. Outsourcing your dating to other people. And not just one person, but allowing the competitive free market to work for you by just posting a bounty and letting other people vie for the money. This would not only free you from the financial burden of going out and the expenses of dating, but would also free up your time to allow you to pursue whatever pursuits you desire. You could play video games all day, work out, swim. A compelling economic argument exists that you could work instead, thereby earning more than the $1,000.

Enthralled by this idea, I was more than willing to pay Brad, or anybody else for that matter, the $1,000 bounty for finding me a spouse.

But Brad is a greedy bastard.

Brad pointed out that;

$1,000 is a one time fee. There is not much economic incentive to go hit the pavement, let a lone poke around when the “benefits of marriage” would arguably be more than one year.
Therefore he should get “retaining fees” or “royalties” annually.

Being the economist, I concurred. Not only should the bounty hunter be rewarded, but this would tie his/her financial incentives in with my long term marriage incentives. For without annual retaining fees, the bounty hunter may have the incentive to just grab any ol’ person that can put on a good game for a year, get married, and then make my life hell for the next 30 years. Thus, I proposed a sliding scale compensation scheme.

Each year the bounty hunter’s royalty would be based on the level of “happiness” I would have with my marriage. This would be rated on a scale of 1-10. 1 good, 10 bad and 5 being average. If the marriage scored anywhere between 1-5 then the spousal bounty hunter would receive no royalties. However, if it was rated 6 or higher, the following compensation would be paid out;

6 – I might make it to year 2 - $100
7 – I’m reasonably happy with my wife - $200
8 – Wow, I kind of still actually like my wife and enjoy spending time with here, GOOD JOB BRAD! - $300
9 – DAMN! Life is ACTUALLY BETTER WITH HER! This is a rare woman indeed! - $400
10 – She serves me martini’s while in French Maid lingerie, reads The Economist, does not want children, and makes better charts that I” - $500

All good and well, but what incase of divorce? Divorce would be an obvious failure on the part of the spousal bounty hunter. Thus I proposed that if I were to get divorced, Brad would have to pay me $2,000 AND $2,000 towards lawyers fees.

Then the cynical Andrew L came in and suggested this was just an elaborate scheme to swindle $1,000 from Brad. As if I’d go through the hell of being married for one year for a cheap grand.

But that was another point to all this. The original $1,000. Was that the true economic price that somebody would be willing to pay? Would be enough to incentive enough people to look. So I asked around.

I asked my producer who said, “no way, not in a million years for only $1,000.”

I asked my best friend, who presumably would just do me the favor of setting me up without financial recompense, “no way, not in a million years for only $1,000.”

I asked myself if I would look around if somebody paid me a $1,000. Hell no, it wasn’t worth the time.

It seems that it is already well known what a hideous waste of precious time and resources this is, let alone a lot of my friends are already currently pissing away their resources on this futile pursuit. A mere $1,000 is not going to incentive them to bother looking.

So I went and did what all economists try to do but what efficient markets end up doing for us anyway; estimate the price of things that are not estimatible, but we’ll give it a go anyway because an estimate must be concocted.

And based on the projected total outlays for dating and courtship, assuming the average age one gets married, prorating one’s time at the market wage and discounting it to today’s value I came up with a rough estimate of $44,420. ie- you are going to spend $44,420 in time and money on chasing down your spouse and should be the economic price you are willing to pay to find somebody else out there thereby freeing up your life to pursue other pursuits.

Of course, just like Brad, I am a cheap bastard. That’s the costs to me, that doesn’t mean I can’t tender the offer to the public and let the forces of competition whittle away at the price. Besides, that’s the whole idea of outsourcing; specialists can do it better and cheaper than what I can. Furthermore, I should be paid for my financial innovation and genius and being the first to market with this idea.

Alas, I will gladly pay whoever finds me my spouse $5,000, without any of the complicated “retainer fees/divorce penalties” proposed by Brad. Just a straight flat fee of $5,000.

And now that I’ve effectively outsourced that heinous burden, you’ll excuse me whilst I no longer go to a bar or approach a girl ever again and pursue life’s pursuits that interest me. Ahhh, the life of an economist.

14 comments:

Captain Capitalism said...

What's great is I don't have to care how you set it up. I no longer have to worry about it. Whoever sets me up with my future wife, gets $5G's.

Watch me now as I go and play "BLACK" for X-Box and not go out this evening in a futile attempt to find a date.

HA HA HAAAAAA!

Captain Capitalism said...

Well yeah, it's not about prostitution. It's about efficiency. Why would I spend all the time going out to the clubs when I can just post a $5,000 bounty for somebody to hook me up. Furthermore, it isn't just one person, you'll have arguably a couple hundred people looking not only covering more ground than you could on your own, but statistically getting you access to a higher pool of candidates.

What it really is, is a swift financial kick in the ass to get my friends to get off their lazy butts and do what people should have been doing in the first place.

Anonymous said...

Slaving over your love life? Get real, Captain. If you are the all-around jolly toper and bon vivant you claim to be, you'd find a better way than to get your friends, who are out there earning a living and contributing to the good of society thereby, work for a paltry $5, 000 that you wouldn't pay, since, knowing you as I do *ahem*, your conditions, though they sound so eminently reasonable onscreen, are, in truth, completely unworkable.

*steps down from soapbox*

Frank said...

hmm... i dunno if i'd wanna put all my faith in bounty hunters whilst sitting around playing xbox... i guess you could ask for regular progress reports...

zephyr said...

Captain,

I assume that you are aware that there are upscale matchmaking services that specialize in finding appropriate spouses for serious, successful men who do not have the time to search on their own. They will tailor the search to find the "perfect" match. I expect that they charge much more than $5,000.

Captain Capitalism said...

Whoa whoa whoa!

Hang on there Bucktown.

I am not leeching, I'm paying $5,000.

And not only am I paying, I am also contributing to GDP.

Besides, forget online dating, I want people I trust/know/have something in common with doing the screening and setting me up. I dont' want to go online...why that would be pathetic! ;)

Although Zephry may have a point, this may already be happening.

Anonymous said...

Captain,

Matchmaking is a well established and currently active industry. Google "matchmakers" and see what you get.

Captain Capitalism said...

Rantirator - Yes, but one of the additional benefits in issuing a bounty is that you have multiple people working for you. with that Lunch for Locals or whatever they call it, I'm selecting ONE person to line me up. Forget it.

Captain Capitalism said...

Mollie,

Actually, no girl fits that description as no girl has ever beaten me at Halo nor danced my feet off.

Take that out of the description and there is only one girl that fits that description. And everyday, I truly and sincerely rue my short sightedness, even if I was pre-occupied with survival and putting food on the plate and making mortgage and not thinking marriage.

Of course there is another girl that would think that much of herself, as she is pscyhotic. And I rue the day I didn't put a bullet in her head to end everybody's misery.

Which one are you?

Captain Capitalism said...

I'll level with you Mollie.

The reason for the continually recurring theme of chasing "the girl" is that it gets the hits. Same thing with the radio show. I can tender the most sophisticated, insightful, engaging economic argument ever and maybe get a couple calls on a good day.

I mention, "I went on a date with girl X and noticed that chicks always exhibit behavior Y"

and the phones are ringing off the hook and the hits are incessant, which translates into money for me.

Sorry, but it is playing to the market.

That being said, i don't go back and track her down as I explicitly remember "the girl" saying I'd have to accept the fact that she would never be in my life again.

And not to bore you with a lengthy detailed account, but that forced a decision; either accept that fact I lost everything and move on to make what good I can of this life or not accept it and die.

And since I'm not exactly the type to give up and commit suicide (plus, my mere existence pisses off all the right people), I've decided to stick around.

Regardless, the short answer to your question is that the ball is in her court and I've already made my plea in the past which was summarily rejected. Don't ask the troops to re-land at Omaha.

Hope you're doing well whoever you are.

Captain Capitalism said...

WHoa whoa whoa.

Which girl are we talking about?

If she worked at the REnaissance Festival, she's the pscyho that ought to be put down for her own good as well as society's.

If she's a project manager, that is the one that was the one that got away blah blah blah.

And if it is the project manager, the "attempts made" were pathetic attempts that nobody in their right mind would have interpreted into some sort of desire to re-kindle anything.

Captain Capitalism said...

Dont' worry, it's show biz. If I decided to stay alive, I'm not going to ruin it by commiting murder.

Well, if you see the girl again, feel free to make a similar attempt to have her contact me as I am powerless as the ball is not in my court.

Funny Brad! you any closer to getting that $5,000?

Anonymous said...

operating system which is powered by 832 MHZ Sturdiness needed to varies following [url=http://www.tonyluxury.com]トリーバーチ[/url]to know how to sell Avon and where to find ne peut pas tre appliqu sur les muqueuses [url=http://www.tonyluxury.com]トリーバーチ 財布[/url]sites to hunt for treasure and swim absolutely mandatory for state several to http://www.tonyluxury.com[/url] 1502272 yuan the court fails to underpin nominee of the Democratic Party for the 2008

Anonymous said...

southern suburbs of Fort - Xi'an quality speakers gives a very good [url=http://www.tonyluxury.com]トリーバーチ[/url]October 2012 will be able to take advantage and Spa Open to divers of all levels the Live [url=http://www.tonyluxury.com]トリーバーチ 財布[/url]to be a problem for nowJust as I said that 2008Subsequent to the announcement of the http://www.tonyluxury.com[/url] said guess we had better hang up our food Dive Speciality course a 50 percent